Bubble Houses: Yesterday’s House of the Future

I’ve shamelessly cribbed topics from my favorite podcasts before so I’ve got few reservations about doing it again. Last week 99% Invisible brought up Wallace Neff’s contribution to postwar housing, his “bubble houses”. You can listen to the podcast (and, ironically, see a bunch of great pictures) and skip the next paragraph, or read on for my cliff notes.

Wallace Neff was a star-chitect in the literal sense, in that he made much of his living designing upscale houses for movie stars. (Topic for a different day: why don’t movie stars hire famous architects?) As World War II drew to a close he decided he wanted to put aside the glamour of LA and contribute to creating affordable houses for returning soldiers. The result: inexpensive concrete domes. A big sturdy bubble is inflated with air over a circular concrete foundation and then sprayed with concrete. Once the bubble is deflated, the inside of the bubble can be lived in.

Credit: Roundhouses blog

Credit: Huntington Library via 99% Invisible

On paper, these houses hit all the sweet spots. They capitalize on an abundant cheap material. With the right equipment they’re not only easy to build, they’re fast (done in 48 hours). But the bubble houses never caught on. They looked weird. People couldn’t find a place for grandma’s hutch against the curved walls. And with Levittowns and other sister developments going up everywhere, returning veterans could eat their cake and have it too. The economy began to boom following the war and very cheap housing just wasn’t important to people who could suddenly afford a “normal” house in suburbia.

Abundance of natural resources makes it difficult to think outside the box. Not only that, the building industry has become so standardized to a 4’x8′ module that innovative solutions, while they may be cheaper in the long term, are expensive to start up. You can see this conflict in the pictures of the bubble houses above; rectangular windows and doors are awkwardly smashed against the round shape of the bubble. Now it’s not enough to be cheap, people want affordable houses but they also want them to be stylish (witness the 100k house and others). In architecture as in so many industries looking to reduce cost and increase energy efficiency, the insiders need to take a stand regarding industry trends. Be forceful against the trends that make the long term situation worse and be creative in establishing price and environmental responsibility.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Bubble Houses: Yesterday’s House of the Future

  1. I really like the bubble house, actually, although I can imagine it is a bitch to decorate. Reminds me of the Earthships in New Mexico, except more like that papier-mache project where you make a globe or head with a balloon.

    That being said, the 100K house looks really good too. I have seen a similar exterior in Brooklyn and I wonder if it’s the same designer. I suppose it might cost a bit more in NYC though.

    • I really like the bubble house, too, and one of the things I was going to bring up but didn’t is that we only think it’s weird because it’s unusual. If we always lived in bubbles, square houses would be gawk-worthy. I think it would be easy enough to furnish if you gave some real thought to the furniture and how best to take advantage of the perimeter spaces. Although, you might spend all the money you saved on construction costs on custom furniture.

      I never thought I would defend curved walls. I never draw curved walls, they scare me.

Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s